In this set of materials, the reading passage introduces the international style, and the listening passage differs from it. The international style is one of architecture forms. It emphasizes function. Moreover, it rejects traditional decoration. The Bauhaus, which was famous German design school, affected that style of the urban building utilized steel, glass, and an open interior. The international style inspired building boom in the United States. Expecially, it was popular in New York. The listening passages contrasts with reading passages. Many towers which was established by international style destroyed cityscape; on the other hand, it sustained popularity. For example, UN secretariat building also headed toward functional respect. Even though it's beautiful building, we are in contact too much with this kind of style. Finally, we can tired of it and feel that it's ugly and also ridiculous.
In this set of materials, the reading passage introduces the "International style" in the history of architecture, and the listening passange presents criticisms against the international style. According to the reading passage, the international style put a high value on function and rejection of traditional decoration. As result, it featured its simplisity as you see in such phrases as "less is more". It fascinated lots of architects and citizens and influenced a number of buildings in modern cities. In the listening passage, the fact that the international style enjoyed its prosperity during mid 20 century is admited. However, some criticisms are given. The international style was thought to have creative portential, but it bashed out lots of vulgar immitations. Conversely, its popularity discredited its reputation. One mocked the famous phrase of the international style saying "less is a bore"
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses the international style, and the listening passage contrasts it. The reading passage is talking about the international style. It is known as the Bauhaus style; in fact, it emphasize on function and rejection of traditional decoration. Those building were built with steel, glass and open interior; in addition, Bauhaus style that is tall and think was evident in New York in U.S. The listening passage contrasts the reading passage. Most of New York’s skyline is made up of tall; as a result, they shaded the city streets. Those building are built by steel and glass that seems to be a glass box; for instance, UN Secretariat. The glass box becomes not only ugly but also ridiculous. In summary, those building were emphasized on function, but it are too much in city; as a result, it lose its elegance.
In this set of materials,the reading passage introduces the international style is featured in stress the function and refusal of tradiotional decoration;the listening pasage challenges the style in reading passage. The reading passage presents the international style emphasizes the function;in contrast,it rejects decoration,now.This style is quite simple;for example,it uses steel,glass,and open interior for structure.It deeply effected in U.S,eapecially in New York. The listening passage casts doubt on the reading passage.It said that the international style had already completely covered cityscape;as a result,that made people feel uncomfortable.Because there are too much the same building style in the city,it lost its elegance,not like before and becoming boring.This style is not special anymore;in addition,critics think that kind of bulding style is ugly and unhuman .In conclusion, this style is thought "less is bore" now!
In this set of materials, the reading passage introduses about the international style, and the listening passage contrast whit it. According to the reading passage, this style became popular since the early twentith ; in fact, this architecture style inspired not only in Europ, but also in the U.S, especially New York. The features of this style can be characterized as a rejection against the traditional style which means a lot of decorations in building;in contrast,it pursues the simplity and the funtional design of building.For example, many supporters of this international style say that the building of U.N secretariat can be considered as a building that represents this architecture style the most. The listening passage has the negative opinion about the international style.According to this statement, most of builings are dominated by this style;indeed, we can't be impressed by this popularity any more.Furthermore, this concept of style ruins cityscape ,and make it more ugly and boring.
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses the international style, and the listening passage this disagrees with reading. The international style is an emphasis on function and rejection of traditional decoration. Utilitarian simplicity is beautiful and elegant. The international style inspired both architects and ordinary citizens. The international style reshaped the city and was one of the most successful architectural movements in history. The listening passage disagrees with reading passage. The international style dominated the architecture of the modern city. The international style takes simplicty and "from follows function" to an extreme, leading cheap, vulgar, and boring. The international style received much negative criticism from architects and the public.
In this set of materials, reading passage talks about the international style but,in listening passage contrasts with different views from it. The international style reinforces in founctional,and it rejects to tradtional decoration. In fact,the directors of Bauhaus who used steel, glass,and an open interior to support a utilitarian simplicity to the form follows function,it also presents simplistic beauty of the buliding. The listening passage points out the difference to the reading passage. the international style might ruins the cityscape.Most of them are uglification and, ridiculious. Also,it turns out leading cheap and, boring. For example,the style of UN secretariat are too many.It only lose its elegance or unspecilaity,In summary, the international style makes those bulidings to not special and, inhuman.
10 comments:
In this set of materials, the reading passage introduces the international style, and the listening passage differs from it. The international style is one of architecture forms. It emphasizes function. Moreover, it rejects traditional decoration. The Bauhaus, which was famous German design school, affected that style of the urban building utilized steel, glass, and an open interior. The international style inspired building boom in the United States. Expecially, it was popular in New York.
The listening passages contrasts with reading passages. Many towers which was established by international style destroyed cityscape; on the other hand, it sustained popularity. For example, UN secretariat building also headed toward functional respect. Even though it's beautiful building, we are in contact too much with this kind of style. Finally, we can tired of it and feel that it's ugly and also ridiculous.
In this set of materials, the reading passage introduces the "International style" in the history of architecture, and the listening passange presents criticisms against the international style.
According to the reading passage, the international style put a high value on function and rejection of traditional decoration. As result, it featured its simplisity as you see in such phrases as "less is more". It fascinated lots of architects and citizens and influenced a number of buildings in modern cities.
In the listening passage, the fact that the international style enjoyed its prosperity during mid 20 century is admited. However, some criticisms are given. The international style was thought to have creative portential, but it bashed out lots of vulgar immitations. Conversely, its popularity discredited its reputation. One mocked the famous phrase of the international style saying "less is a bore"
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses the international style, and the listening passage contrasts it.
The reading passage is talking about the international style. It is known as the Bauhaus style; in fact, it emphasize on function and rejection of traditional decoration. Those building were built with steel, glass and open interior; in addition, Bauhaus style that is tall and think was evident in New York in U.S.
The listening passage contrasts the reading passage. Most of New York’s skyline is made up of tall; as a result, they shaded the city streets. Those building are built by steel and glass that seems to be a glass box; for instance, UN Secretariat. The glass box becomes not only ugly but also ridiculous. In summary, those building were emphasized on function, but it are too much in city; as a result, it lose its elegance.
In this set of materials,the reading passage introduces the international style is featured in stress the function and refusal of tradiotional decoration;the listening pasage challenges the style in reading passage.
The reading passage presents the international style emphasizes the function;in contrast,it rejects decoration,now.This style is quite simple;for example,it uses steel,glass,and open interior for structure.It deeply effected in U.S,eapecially in New York.
The listening passage casts doubt on the reading passage.It said that the international style had already completely covered cityscape;as a result,that made people feel uncomfortable.Because there are too much the same building style in the city,it lost its elegance,not like before and becoming boring.This style is not special anymore;in addition,critics think that kind of bulding style is ugly and unhuman .In conclusion, this style is thought "less is
bore" now!
In this set of materials, the reading passage introduses about the international style, and the listening passage contrast whit it.
According to the reading passage, this style became popular since the early twentith ; in fact, this architecture style inspired not only in Europ, but also in the U.S, especially New York.
The features of this style can be characterized as a rejection against the traditional style which means a lot of decorations in building;in contrast,it pursues the simplity and the funtional design of building.For example, many supporters of this international style say that the building of U.N secretariat can be considered as a building that represents this architecture style the most.
The listening passage has the negative opinion about the international style.According to this statement, most of builings are dominated by this style;indeed, we can't be impressed by this popularity any more.Furthermore, this concept of style ruins cityscape ,and make it more ugly and boring.
In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses the international style, and the listening passage this disagrees with reading.
The international style is an emphasis on function and rejection of traditional decoration. Utilitarian simplicity is beautiful and elegant. The international style inspired both architects and ordinary citizens. The international style reshaped the city and was one of the most successful architectural movements in history.
The listening passage disagrees with reading passage. The international style dominated the architecture of the modern city. The international style takes simplicty and "from follows function" to an extreme, leading cheap, vulgar, and boring. The international style received much negative criticism from architects and the public.
In this set of materials, reading passage talks about the international style but,in listening passage contrasts with different views from it. The international style reinforces in founctional,and it rejects to tradtional decoration. In fact,the directors of Bauhaus who used steel, glass,and an open interior to support a utilitarian simplicity to the form follows function,it also presents simplistic beauty of the buliding.
The listening passage points out the difference to the reading passage. the international style might ruins the cityscape.Most of them are uglification and, ridiculious. Also,it turns out leading cheap and, boring. For example,the style of UN secretariat are too many.It only lose its elegance or unspecilaity,In summary, the international style makes those bulidings to not special and, inhuman.
Post a Comment